Political Opposition

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, a prominent figure in Democratic politics and two-time presidential candidate, delivered a sobering message regarding former President Donald Trump during a podcast hosted by Democratic election law expert Marc Elias.

Speaking on the “Defending Democracy” podcast, Clinton expressed concerns that if Trump were to secure another term in office, he might resort to extreme measures such as targeting his political adversaries or incarcerating them.

She suggested that Trump would opt to suppress dissent much like authoritarian figures such as Vladimir Putin. According to her, Trump holds admiration for leaders wielding excessive authority, who stifle criticism by incarcerating or exiling dissenting voices, akin to tactics employed by autocratic regimes.

It’s worth noting, however, that during his tenure, Donald Trump did not imprison any political adversaries nor did he sanction any assassinations, despite facing widespread negative media coverage, including various instances of misinformation and false reports concerning the former president.

In essence, Clinton’s assertions regarding Donald Trump lack a factual basis rooted in historical occurrences.

“Trump was like, you know, just gaga over Putin because Putin does what Trump would like to do: Kill his opposition, imprison his opposition, drive journalists and others into exile, rule without any check or balance,” Clinton claimed without evidence.

“That’s what Trump really wants,” she went on. “And so we have to be very conscious of how he sees the world because, in that world, he only sees strongmen leaders. He sees Putin, he sees Xi, he sees Kim Jong-un in North Korea. Those are the people he is modeling himself after, and we’ve been down this road in our, you know, world history. We sure don’t want to go down that again.”

Hillary continued to fret about the possibility that Donald Trump could be re-elected. She lamented that the U.S. could leave NATO, a Cold War institution founded to stop the threat of communism posed by the now-defunct Soviet Union, and she baselessly speculated that Trump would run the U.S. government as a totalitarian, again, without any evidence to back up her assertions.

“Withdrawing us from NATO, not caring about what happens with Europe, the idea that he wants Ukraine to fail. The idea that he doesn’t want us to be able to surveil our enemies. This is a very scary prospect,” she said.

There is much more evidence to support the argument that the Biden administration is trying to jail its political opponents than a potential Trump administration.

The Biden regime authorized an unprecedented raid on a former president with the FBI raid at Mar-a-Lago in September 2022, ostensibly to find documents on the Crossfire Hurricane op that Hillary Clinton fueled with the Steele dossier.

The Department of Justice illegally appointed Special Counsel Jack Smith to lead a vindictive and selectively prosecuted classified documents case, since President Biden was acquitted for being a  ‘sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory’ despite lacking the ultimate declassification authority that Donald Trump had at the time of the alleged infraction.

Smith is also leading a probably unconstitutional January 6 probe, since former President Donald Trump was exonerated by Senate impeachment trial. Contrary to popular media misreporting about the event, the president did not “incite” the pre-planned riot, which took place amid intentionally lax security despite Trump’s calls for enhanced National Guard security during the election challenges.

There is significant evidence suggesting collusion between the Biden administration, the Department of Justice, and Congressional Democrats in orchestrating multiple criminal trials aimed at potentially incarcerating former President Donald Trump, who stands as a leading contender in the 2024 presidential race.

In the Georgia “racketeering” case concerning Trump’s legal challenges to the 2024 election results, Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis and former special prosecutor Nathan Wade reportedly collaborated with the partisan J6 special committee and the White House counsel.

Meanwhile, in Manhattan, the transfer of Matthew Colangelo, a senior official within the U.S. Justice Department, to serve as senior counsel to Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, preceded the announcement of an investigation into “hush money,” raising concerns about potential coordination within the Biden administration to pursue the criminal case, possibly amounting to election interference.

Furthermore, Judge Juan Merchan, who presides over the case, has familial ties to prominent Democrats such as Kamala Harris and Joe Biden, leading to apprehensions regarding impartiality. Merchan has even threatened to jail Trump for missing a day of trial during the presidential campaign or violating a “gag order.”

CNN, among others, has notably displayed a bias by openly advocating for Trump’s imprisonment, even at the risk of causing “civil unrest” before the 2024 election.

In light of these circumstances, Hillary Clinton’s allegations against Trump should be seen not merely as accusations but as warnings, especially considering the possibility that certain partisan Democrats might harbor extreme sentiments, preferring Trump’s demise over his return to power.